Friday, November 22, 2002

 

The Longest Yard



Bah! Rod puts some more touch on that pass, and we're headed to overtime. Damn. Alas, it wasn't to be. No moral victories for us anymore; winning is the only acceptable outcome. Much credit goes to all the Pitt players who let it all hang out on the field and kept nothing back. Let's beat the Hoopies and go to the Gator Bowl, probably against Maryland. That would be one helluva game.

Thursday, November 21, 2002

 

Iron Bowl



How could I forget one of the fiercest rivalries ever? D'oh! Francione schools Tuberville as the elephant metaphorically stomps all over War Eagle.

'Bama 32, Auburn 7.

 

More Fearless Predictions



Hopefully more accurate this week ... only 7 correct picks. Kansas State and Georgia were the best picks of the week. Congrats to the WVU Hoopies for knocking off a now-demoralized VaTech squad. If Pitt knocks off Miami tonight, it will be the Brawl for it All. Anyway, on to the picks!



Until next week!

Thursday, November 14, 2002

 

This Week's Picks



This will likely become a major feature as, well, I'm always very sports-oriented. Grad school keeps me from doing too much politicizing.

Last Week: 10-3, straight up. Particularly prescient picks for the Terps, the Titans, and the Rams. I had the gist of the Pitt-Temple and KSU-ISU game, though the scores were way off. Falcons and Steelers kiss their sisters, though both teams could easily have won the game. As for the MNF pick ... let's pretend that one never happened. On to this week!












Thursday, November 07, 2002

 

The Big Finish ... For This Week



Pardon the BloggEruption will be taking the rest of the week off, since I will be with my gorgeous lady friend this weekend back in the 'Burgh. Also, I'll be attending the first game Pitt has played as a ranked team since 1991, and I'll be grabbing dinner at my favorite Indian restaurant Friday night. No, I will not be at TRASH regionals at CMU. I have precious few days with the SO, and I'm going to spend as much time as possible with her. (Love you, ALD)

In the meantime, though ... The Big Finish ...



Wednesday, November 06, 2002

 

More Election Rundown



Colorado: Sen. Wayne Allard knew something no one outside of Colorado seemed to know -- he was never in any serious danger.

Florida: Ditto.

Maryland: Ehrlich's win over Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, while historically unexpected, was no major shock. She ran a very weak campaign and was seriously hindered by an unpopular outgoing Democrat governor (Glendening). More unnoticed by the media was Ehrlich's running mate, Michael Steele. Steele, an African-American, may have pulled a number of votes from the normally-monolithic black community, particularly since KKT did not choose a black running mate (she was under much pressure to do so). Congressionally, the GOP loses two seats to the Democrats here, but that was not particularly surprising. Redistricting by the Democratic legislature and shifting Maryland demographics had sealed that fate a while ago.

Missouri: As has been stated before, sympathy only extends so far. The Widow Carnahan kept it close with Jim Talent, largely due to overwhelming support coming out of St. Louis (which raises some issues in and of itself ... STL has become the modern Chicago of voter fraud). I would expect Talent to retain the office in 2006, barring any personal scandals. Missouri's a fairly moderate to conservative state, and incumbents have historically performed well (albeit in squeakers) here.

Minnesota: As I predicted (though not on this page), Mondale tanked in the days leading up to the election, most notably after the Wellstone memorial fiasco. Coleman was the clear winner of Monday morning's debate, though it is certainly questionable as to what effect, if any, that had on the race. My gut tells me that the debate's effect was limited to reducing Mondale's numbers, rather than increasing Coleman's. While this is highly speculative, I'm going to say that if Wellstone doesn't die, Coleman still wins. Pawlenty's victory in the wide-open gubernatorial race with 46% of the vote is promising for GOP prospects here in 2004, particularly if the younger, independent-minded Ventura crowd can be wooed with promises of Social Security and tax reform.

I could go on, but I think that's enough for now.

 

All Your Congress Are Belong To Us



What happen!?!? Somebody set us up the sweep! Those who know me know that I'm a small-"L" libertarian, largely vote GOP in the big races, and vote Libertarian whenever possible for the smaller ones. Basically, after watching coverage through about 2AM Central last night, I haven't been this politically pumped since November 1994. It is a great day for Republicans, one that should translate to a victory for personal freedom, economic freedom, states' rights, and national security.

Democrats are generally pissing themselves, as well they should -- they should have had this election handed to them on a silver platter, and they totally blew it. The Dems have no ideas, no agenda, and no reasons to give people to vote for them, instead of against Republicans. Hence, the lesson of negative campaigning -- it works on an individual level, when you can contrast and individual candidate's supposedly bad record / qualities with the positive record / qualities of the opposition candidate. On a general level, most people just will not buy the idea that "Republicans are eeeeeeeeeevil," especially not with a Republican president as popular as Bush.

(Incidentally, any talk of Lincoln Chafee jumping ship is pure bunk -- he's successful because of his father's legacy, and his father was always staunch about party loyalty, even if he voted moderate to liberal on occasion. If anything, Jumpin' Jim Jeffords is lamenting his switch. He will wallow in total irrelevance for the next two years. If Talent is to take office quickly, look for the new Minn. senator to caucus with the Republicans.)

So, what does yesterday's victory mean for American politics as a whole? Potentially a lot, but probably very little. The nation continues to be split about 49/49 GOP / Dem, though I think we might say that the ratio may have changed a bit over the past year, something akin to 49.5 / 48.5. Attribute this to some Reagan Democrats switching after 9/11. The ball is entirely in the Republicans' court right now to put up or shut up, and I suspect that they'll be fairly successful at getting most of the core agenda through. Judicial confirmations will speed up drastically, potentially starting now.

"All politics is local," according to Tip O'Neill, though, and it's worth taking a look at some key races and results:

Texas: Victories by Perry and Cornyn were expected. Dewhurst's victory in the Lt. Governor race was about as tight as we thought going in to the home stretch, but I think this may be the end of John Sharp's political career in Texas. Dewhurst was very vulnerable. A GOP sweep of all the statewide offices continues recent trends, but most importantly, Republicans captured the Texas House for the first time since Reconstruction. Democratic Speaker Pete Laney is expected to keep his seat, though, attesting to the very conservative nature of successful Texas Dems. The state Senate remains solidly Republican. Basically, Texas cancels out California.

Georgia: Huge gains for the Republicans with Saxby Chambliss knocking off Max Cleland in the Senate, and Sonny Perdue crushing the national hopes of incumbent Democratic governor Roy Barnes. Georgia is once again trending solid Republican, but does this mean the popular Zell Miller is in trouble a few years from now? Not likely, though if the GOP makes consistent gains in 2004, he is a definite possiblility to switch parties.

More analysis to come later tonight.

Sunday, November 03, 2002

 

Hail to Pitt!



Hail to Pitt, indeed! How about a grand old Alleghanee Genac Genac Genac! Congratulations to the Panthers, Walt Harris, and the whole of the Pitt community for knocking off the #3 Hokies! How 'bout them Panthers!!!

My orignal prediction was VaTech 30, Pitt 17, but I'm happy as can be that we pulled this one off. Bring on the Owls, the Canes, and the Hoopies! We control our own destiny in the Big East, so I have high hopes for the rest of the season. We should be at least #21 this week. Hail to Pitt!!!!!

(Can you tell I'm excited?)

Saturday, November 02, 2002

 

State Flags -- What Do You Think?



Texas, with a score of 39, was the clear winner of the contest. Some of you will say that I'm biased, being a native Texan and current resident. Well, this might be true, but I'm going to let my readership chime in with comments and votes of their own. In the spirit of fairness, I'd also like to hear what you think the worst flag was. So, here we go:

Top 6 Flags

  1. Texas ... 39
  2. New Mexico ... 34
  3. Maryland ... 32
  4. Tennessee ... 32
  5. Arizona ... 30
  6. Colorado ... 30



Bottom 6 Flags

  1. Georgia ... 0
  2. Oregon ... 1
  3. Michigan ... 5
  4. Connecticut ... 9
  5. Pennsylvania ... 9
  6. New York ... 9



Please submit your votes, comments, etc., either through the comment doohickey here or through my e-mail. Results will be posted by Wednesday.

 

State Flags, Day 10 -- The Conclusion



VIRGINIA



Deep blue field features state seal of Virginia on center. Seal features female figure Virtue, standing atop a fallen tyrant (signified by the fallen crown, scourge, and chain). Seal reads "VIRGINA" above and "SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS" below.

  • Visual Appeal: 5
    Yeah, it's a seal with words and detailed figures. But come on, it says "Sic Semper Tyranis." How many other flags have the words of assassins on them? Or a cool scene straight out of early American ideology?
  • Significance: 4
    Harkens back to revolutionary time. And the assassination of Lincoln.
  • Recognition: 5
    Seal does read "VIRGINIA."
  • Reproducability: 3
    At least the seal's not too cluttered.
  • Overall: 15
    Virtue really needs to learn how to properly hold a sword. Somebody's going to get hurt.



    WASHINGTON



    Green field with the state seal in the center. Seal featues the bust of George Washington.

  • Visual Appeal: 3
    I like the green field, but I just don't like putting people on flags. Let alone real, historical ones. That never even came close to visiting the place his visage now represents.
  • Significance: 3
    OK, they named the state after him. Is that all they have to say? Guess so.
  • Recognition: 6
    Well, if you can't recognize GW from the dollar bill, they do say "WASHINGTON" on the seal.
  • Reproducability: 2
    Well, at least you don't have to try to include Washington's smallpox scars ...
  • Overall: 14
    OK, we definitely need a state flag rejuvenation project.



    WEST VIRGINIA



    White field with a blue border. Center of field contains state coat of arms. Coat of arms features two figures, a farmer and miner, flanking a rock with the date "JUNE 20, 1863" inscribed upon it. A "Liberty Cap" is atop two crossed rifles, and beneath that is a ribbon reading "MONTANI SEMPER LIBER!". The shield is surrounded by a rhododendron wreath and another ribbon reading "STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA."

  • Visual Appeal: 3
    I like the blue border / white field effect, but the coat of arms is a bit much.
  • Significance: 6
    Coat of arms does a good job describing the Hoopie State.
  • Recognition: 5
    As always.
  • Reproducability: 2
    Detailed figures, etc.
  • Overall: 16
    Shoot, Gomer, them Hoopies done good!



    WISCONSIN



    Dark blue field with state coat of arms in center. Above coat of arms is "WISCONSIN" and below it is "1848." Coat of arms features a sailor, a miner, a badger, a cornucopia, a pile of lead, various equipment, an Old Glory shield in the center, and a ribbon reading "FORWARD."

  • Visual Appeal: 2
    Ugh, this is as busy as can be. With words. And the Gordon's Fisherman.
  • Significance: 5
    Remember those maps in the encyclopedias that have the little figures showing the natural resources of various states and countries? WI's flag looks a bit like that.
  • Recognition: 5
    HELLO, My name is ______.
  • Reproducability: 1
    Yeah, sure.
  • Overall: 13
    Again, I repeat my call for flag rejuvenation.



    WYOMING



    Blue field with a thin white inner border and thicker red outer border. A white bison dominates the field, and the b&w state seal is centered on its heart. Seal features a cowboy, a miner, and a bunch of words.

  • Visual Appeal: 7
    Despite the presence of the seal, I've always liked Wyoming's flag. I mean, it looks like they use it for target practice!
  • Significance: 7
    Bison = western, and the seal. Equal rights, etc.
  • Recognition: 5
    Pretty well known, I think.
  • Reproducability: 3
    Again, the detailed seal.
  • Overall: 22
    If it didn't have the seal, it would be even cooler.



    And thats it, boys and girls! Thanks for reading!

  • Friday, November 01, 2002

     

    State Flags, Day 9


    Almost there!


    SOUTH DAKOTA



    Sky blue field with the state seal in the center. Seal is surrounded by a 24-point blazing sun. Arround the seal and sun are the words "SOUTH DAKOTA THE MOUNT RUSHMORE STATE." State seal is black/white and features an agrarian scene and lots of words.

  • Visual Appeal: 4
    Aside from the plethora of words and the seal, this one actually doesn't look that bad. I'm thinking it's the sun on the sky blue field that saves it.
  • Significance: 1
    Well, it says "MOUNT RUSHMORE STATE" but doesn't have Rushmore on there. The seal is pretty bland, too, and the sun in the sky I'd associate more with Montana. Sorry.
  • Recognition: 6
    If you don't get the "MOUNT RUSHMORE STATE" reference, "SOUTH DAKOTA" might do it for you.
  • Reproducability: 4
    The seal.
  • Overall: 15
    Not bad for a cookie-cutter flag.



    TENNESSEE



    Crimson field broken by a thin vertical blue stripe at the fly end, with a white border. The center of the flag is a blue circle (again with white border). Within the circle are three white, five-pointed stars.

  • Visual Appeal: 9
    Very solid.
  • Significance: 6
    The central circle's three stars stand for the three land types in TN. Not too exciting.
  • Recognition: 8
    The central circle is pretty well known.
  • Reproducability: 9
    Odd angles of the three stars limit it here.
  • Overall: 32
    One of our nation's best flags.



    TEXAS



    A blue union, 1/3 of the flag's fly, occupies the full hoist, while the remainder of the field is divided equally, with a white bar atop a red bar. At the center of the blue field is a lone, white, five-pointed star.

  • Visual Appeal: 10
    About as simple a flag as they come, while retaining much individual flair. Easy colors, easy shapes, strong lines. "Honor the Texas Flag. I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas -- one and indivisible."
  • Significance: 9
    Too much history to go into, but the lone star, coupled with US colors tell the story. Declare your solitary independence. Become a nation. Look to join the US. Retain your individuality. Be a Lone Star.
  • Recognition: 10
    Unless you're from Chile, this flag instantly means Texas all around the world.
  • Reproducability: 10
    So simple, millions of kindergarteners draw it every year in Texas.
  • Overall: 39
    Hands down, the winner of the contest. The Texas flag would likely fare extremely well in the international competition, too.



    UTAH



    Blue field with state coat of arms at the center. Seal features a central beehive on a shield bearing the words "INDUSTRY" and "UTAH." A bald eagle sits atop the shield, and crossed American flags are behind. Below the shield are the dates 1847 and 1896.

  • Visual Appeal: 1
    Very lame; violates so many laws. I'm starting to think that there should be some Corrolarys to my Flag Laws. #1. Dates suck even more that words. #2. Flags should generally not feature other flags. (The last one might or might not apply to certain Commonwealth states. Depends on how it fits in.)
  • Significance: 6
    The Beehive State. The dates are significant with Mormon settlement and statehood.
  • Recognition: 5
    Boy, when I think "Industry," I think "Utah." Or not.
  • Reproducability: 2
    Detailed figures, words, etc.
  • Overall: 14
    Blah.



    VERMONT



    Blue field with the state coat of arms in the center. Coat of arms features a pine tree, a cow, and wheat. Shield is surrounded by pine branches and topped by a deer's head. Below the shield is a ribbon reading "VERMONT FREEDOM AND UNITY".

  • Visual Appeal: 3
    The coat of arms actually looks pretty nice. It's got a cow! But still, as a flag ... no.
  • Significance: 2
    Not a whole lot of significance with the pines. The Green Mountains are in the scene, but that's it.
  • Recognition: 4
    "VERMONT" is small on the ribbon.
  • Reproducability: 1
    The shield's border and the pine boughs are so intricate as to be ridiculous.
  • Overall: 10
    As a flag ... zzzzzzzzzzzz.


  • This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?